Sunday, September 29, 2013

America The Grotesque

We once had style and grace in this country
The Phantom knows he is rapidly aging. 
 One sure fire sign of the winged chariot hurrying near is the perception that people have become more grotesque and taste putrefied.

Last night, the Phantom attended "West Side Story" at the Ogunquit Playhouse, a stunning production, with astonishing sets, wonderful voices and actors and music, the closest America has got to Andrew Lloyd Weber, not to mention Shakespeare.

Behind him, sat two octogenarians and when the first few bars of "Maria" were sung from the stage, they started singing along, like dogs picking up the howl. A few seats away, down the row, a woman madly texted on her smart phone, the screen glowing in the dark theater and on the other side of the aisle a man sat with his huge, edematous, naked legs protruding from beneath his shorts and flowered shirt. 

The Phantom looked around him and thought, "This is not 'West Side Story,' this is Fellini."

It's not just Maine.

The Phantom unearthed a photograph of his mother, caught by a street photographer as she walked down Fifth Avenue, circa 1940, in hat, gloves, handbag.  She looked wonderful. "Oh, you would never think of going out in public without gloves and a hat," she said. "It just wasn't done."  And the Phantom's mother was not from money--her parents were tailors, living in a fourth floor walk up. But she had style and she was impeccably dressed and fitted out.

This is not mother, but the point remains: Taste was not confined to the rich.
Over the years, Presidents at press conferences point to members of the press corps and call on them by first names:  "John," or "Judy."  Everyone is on a first name basis in America now.

To say, "Mr. Smith," or "Ms. Jones" is to be insufferably stuffy and distant and aloof or, heaven forbid, arrogant.

Heaven deliver America from informality. Look what it has wrought.



Now look at us.

You would not see this in Paris.

Even the Brits would be appalled.

This is America. This is us.
 

4 comments:

  1. This had me laughing for awhile-you always manage to find the perfect pictures to illustrate your point..My mother operated with similar rules, hat and gloves, short coats with"slacks", mandatory full length coat with dresses, matching shoes and purse etc. Like your mother, her family was not wealthy but looking well kempt was important. Of course she occasionally went off the rails-like dressing my sister in plaid pants and a double breasted blazer making her look more like Thurston Howell III than a kid going out to play-but overall she did a good job of making sure none of us looked like we were raised by wolves when we went out. Even now, in her eighties, she still has the same fondness for new clothes and matching shoes and purses. Which is a good thing-she could be out and about in Batman shorts or a polyester sweatsuit. For me the most troubling part is where do we go from here-since the trajectory of what is considered appropriate is heading south what comes after Batman shorts and the fart t-shirt? Buck naked with crude sayings spray painted on your back? By the way Phantom you never shared what you wore to the play-an ascot perhaps?

    Did you see the opinion piece in the NY Times last week by Bill Wyman pushing for Bob Dylan to win the Nobel Prize for Literature. I do believe his lyrics are poetry but should he be awarded a Nobel prize? Would he even want one? Joyce, Ibsen, Twain, Tolstoy were never chosen-maybe he'd prefer the company of the rejected...
    Maud

    ReplyDelete
  2. Maud,

    I've annoyed my sons for years by saying the Nobel prize in literature is pretty irrelevant because they've ignored the towering American poet of the past half century. And look at who they've chosen.
    A prize is not an accomplishment. It says nothing much about the recipient but quite a lot about the award givers.
    That Hemingway, George Bernard Shaw and Churchill won meant they had the capacity to see the obvious quality in those people, but, as you point out, they have missed others--although I'm not sure the prize was around for Twain or Tolstoy.
    At any rate, I'd rather have a contract from a Hollywood studio to do a TV miniseries than win the Nobel prize in literature.
    Dylan is clearly without peer in English letters.

    The Phantom

    ReplyDelete
  3. Actually, Tolstoy was nominated in 1902 and Twain in 1906--both rejected. Are you impressed with my command of Nobel facts? Pretty good, huh..ok it's what I read-I thought Twain was dead by then myself, but I was wrong-he was still among the living... It would appear Dylan may be overlooked because he is "just a songwriter" -but the fact that he's able to successfully put his poetry to music should be further testimony to his genius..But I'm not that objective either--I think he should win any and all prizes he's even remotely eligible for...As for awards, I guess I'd take the Nobel prize over a Hollywood contract-just think of how it would read in one's obit..

    ReplyDelete
  4. Maud,

    That, and it would make mother so proud. My daughter, the Nobel prize winner.

    The Phantom

    ReplyDelete